I love TV. Specifically, I love my TV. It's 46 glorious inches of high def LCD goodness. It provides windows into worlds I could never visit and glimpses into situations I would never consider otherwise. For example, tonight I was flipping through the stations and came across the Discovery Health channel. Now, normally I don't frequent that particular channel, but the title caught my eye. Who could resist "I'm Pregnant...and a Nudist?" Pure gold. In the span of 10 minutes, I was able to observe a nudist baby shower (thank goodness for the little fuzzy boxes that cover things nobody needs to see) and here the mother's counseling session with a family therapist regarding raising her daughter in a nudist family. Two things I have to get off my chest.
One, a nudist baby shower is just wrong. A
mixed nudist baby shower is even worse. Some attend clothed, some don't. The mother-to-be decided out of respect for the comfort level of the non-nudist in attendance, she would remain clothed. The grandmother-to-be also chose to cover up as the hostess of the party. Great-grandmother, on the other hand, did not. In the final analysis, if someone is willing to come to a baby shower where even one person would probably be naked, I don't think the mother-to-be or host dressing up is that big of a deal. In any case, there should be a nude and non-nude food table. Think about it, that ain't sanitary.
Two, why is it that most people that lead a somewhat deviant life style always stress that they will not force their lifestyle on their children? Instead, the child will decide what is best for him or her. I'm not much of a baby expert, but from what I can tell babies/toddlers love to be naked. The only thing a baby likes better than being naked is being naked while covering something in excrement. We know which way that is going at least through age five. What happens between 5-12 is a tossup, but I'm betting the kid chooses clothing once he or she realizes that being the only naked kid in elementary school is not the best way to make friends. By the age of 12, the expectant mother thinks her child will be mature enough to then accept or reject the nudist lifestyle. The only thing more incredible than that idea is that the therapist then told the camera that she
assumes the mother has weighed all of the risks and will make the best decision for her child. Yes, crazy therapist lady, if there's one thing a nudist has, its rational thought processes and proper understanding of social interactions.
What does this have to do with Job? Nothing. Consider this my plea for the sequel to begin production immediately titled "I'm Pregnant...and Not a Total Weirdo."
Job 36 & 37
Elihu is wrapping up his speech. He hasn't been perfect, but he's made some very good points. He continues that trend with these final two chapters. First, Elihu emphasizes God's just nature. God does, Elihu states, deal with both the wicked and the righteous appropriately. God does not care whether the person is a pauper or a prince, they always get what they deserve. If the righteous man strays, God is faithful to point out the error of his ways and allow him a chance to repent. If the man repents, God rewards him. If the man doesn't, he "shall perish by the sword" according to verse 12. Elihu has one thing right...God is a just God. He deals with all of us as we deserve. Unfortunately for us, we deserve eternal death. And apart from Jesus work on the cross, we will all get what we deserve. Elihu warns Job that he is at a crossroads where he can respond to God's correction with either repentance or stubborn refusal. If he repents, God "would have brought you out of dire distress" (v. 16). If he doesn't, God's wrath will be released in such a way that "a large ransom would not help you avoid it" (v. 18).
Having defended God's just nature rather imperfectly, Elihu moves on to God's majesty and power. I suppose its my pride, but I have trouble not viewing Job and God an relatively close planes. It's not a conscious thought, but rather an underlying assumption I didn't even realize I had until I thought about it. I looked at it as more a boss/subordinate-type dynamic than the "all-powerful majestic and holy God" and "mortal fallen human" interaction it really is. Elihu reminds both Job and I of that. God's voice is as thunder and commands the lightning. He has never been taught nor corrected. God controls the wind, rain, snow, and seasons. God convenes storms and sends them as either correction, replenishment for the land, or blessing via crop-watering rain. Elihu challenges Job to seriously ponder how God controls the clouds, or warms him via the southern wind, or designs the skies. Having considered all that, how can Job possibly speak to God as one deserving an audience (37:20)? If we cannot even look at the sun because of its overwhelming brightness, how can we possible take in its Creator (32:21-22)? Elihu finishes with this description of God in chapter 37 verses 23 - 24:
He is excellent in power, in judgement and abundant justice; He does not oppress. Therefore men fear Him...
I like science. It's cool. Chicks dig it, sort of. It explains a lot of things. In some ways, though, its put us at a disadvantage. In Elihu and Job's day, supernatural beings were commonly used to explain natural phenomenon that they observed but couldn't understand. In some cultures, this gave birth to either incorrect monotheism or, more often, polytheism. In this case, Elihu correctly ascribes them to the one true God. However, thanks to years of scientific advances, we now better understand the mechanisms that drive seasonal change or weather patterns. We can read about them in textbooks and understand them. All that is well and good. However, it has negatively impacted our appreciation and awe for God. Thunder and lightning isn't a mysterious sign of God's power and creative genius any more. It's just what happens when energy moves between two oppositely charged electrical fields in the atmosphere. Nevermind that we still don't understand all facets of lightning, that its taken 2000+ years for us to even gain a partial understanding, and knowing how something works is drastically inferior to conceiving, designing, and creating it. Nope, we humans are smart, getting smarter, and destined to figure this whole thing out one day (for anybody that actually believes this, watch "I'm Pregnant...and a Nudist." We just aren't that bright). Once we've achieved that knowledge, we won't need an archaic notion of God any more. God literally help us when we reach that stage.
Conclusion
With that, the stage is set. Elihu has effectively introduced the main character in the story. God is about to make His entrance. He will reiterate and expand upon some of the incomplete ideas begun by Elihu. What's the takeaway from tonight? God is just, wise, and infinitely powerful. He may not act in all situations as we immediately hoped He would, but in the end His justice will be evident. I still believe God doesn't mind honest questioning, but we must avoid Job's folly of attacking God's character. Quite simply, He is God and we are not. My prayer is that I will remember that every moment of every day. That my inner thought life, interactions with the outside world, and spiritual walk will always reflect that simple truth. The ant doesn't dictate to the human, and the human certainly doesn't dictate to a just and holy God.